| About an Anomaly that challenges Relativity |
     |
About an Anomaly that challenges Relativity
Mach?s Principle versus Principle of Radical-Non-Duality
A paper by Helmut Hansen, Hamburg (200
http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/abstracts/NPA2008PaperHANSEN.pdf
| Zitat: |
Abstract:
The first step in scientific revolution or paradigm shift is the awareness of the existence of an anomaly. It means to see clearly that a special fact cannot be explained by an universally accepted paradigm.
Although relativity - one of the most driving paradigm of contemporary physics - is working efficiently in the most cases there is one fact, which cannot be explained by it.
This fact concerns a specific coincidence. Physicists have observed that the local inertial compass coincides with the frame of the most distant galaxies and quasars within the present measurement accuracy of 2.5 x 10-4 arcsec/year.
In modern physics Mach?s Principle is the most favoured hypothesis to explain this fact. It maintains that the local inertial compass, f.e. Foucault?s pendulum, is determined by all the masses in the universe in such a way that the measured coincidence is given. As Mach?s Principle implies that not only gravity but all physics shall be formulated without any reference to an all-pervasive background like an ether, it is physically considered as the climax of relativity. But Mach?s Principle could never be formulated in a precise way. The above mentioned coincidence is thus still unexplained. But it is not yet epistemologically recognized as an anomaly that challenges the relativistic paradigm.
In this paper an argument is presented that could change the epistemological status of this fact tremendously. Actually this fact can be explained as the ?signature? of an omnipresent and invisible meta-ether.
?Science in the twenty-first century will be spiritual, or it will not be.?
Andre Malraux
(Zitatende) |
Lesen Sie bitte weiter unter:
About an Anomaly that challenges Relativity
http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/abstracts/NPA2008PaperHANSEN.pdf
Beste Gr??e Ekkehard Friebe
|
